As the Commissioner of a Municipal Corporation in Assam, it is my ethical duty to address the corrupt practices undermining the first-come, first-serve principle in the granting of building permissions and occupancy certificates. The unethical actions of officials—favoritism, bribery, and unnecessary delays—are detrimental to public trust and the efficiency of governance. Drawing from the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) and ethical scholars like Immanuel Kant and Mahatma Gandhi, the following steps aim to eradicate this menace and promote transparency, fairness, and accountability.

Stakeholders Involved:

1. Citizens: Those applying for building permissions and occupancy certificates, who suffer due to delays and corruption.
2. Municipal Corporation Staff: Officers and inspectors who are responsible for processing applications and conducting inspections.
3. Builders and Contractors: Often at the receiving end of unnecessary hurdles and bribery demands.
4. State Government: Responsible for providing overall guidelines and ensuring accountability in public services.

Steps to Eradicate the Menace:

A. Introduce E-Governance and Automation:

• Implement a digital platform for the submission, tracking, and approval of building permits and occupancy certificates. This system will automatically queue applications in a first-come, first-serve basis, eliminating human intervention in the selection process.
• Example: States like Maharashtra and Karnataka have successfully implemented online approval systems, reducing corruption and ensuring transparency.
• Justification: The 2nd ARC emphasizes e-governance as a powerful tool to enhance transparency and eliminate discretionary powers, thereby reducing opportunities for corruption.

B. Transparency in Procedures:

• Publish standard operating procedures (SOPs) and timelines for building permissions and occupancy certificates on the Municipal Corporation’s website. Ensure that citizens know the process, expected documents, and timelines in advance, fostering predictability and accountability.
• Data from the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Report shows that simplifying and making regulatory procedures transparent significantly reduces corruption.
• Justification: Immanuel Kant’s theory of duty emphasizes the importance of fairness and uniform application of rules, aligning with the ethical responsibility to treat every citizen equally without favoritism.

C. Whistleblower Mechanism and Citizen Grievance Redressal:

• Establish a whistleblower mechanism for employees and grievance redressal portal for citizens to anonymously report any corruption, bribery, or irregularities in processing their applications.
• Example: The Public Grievance Redressal System implemented by Kerala’s Local Self-Government Department has improved accountability by allowing citizens to track complaints and monitor the progress of their applications.
• Justification: As Mahatma Gandhi emphasized, “Be the change you wish to see in the world.” Encouraging accountability within the system ensures that both staff and citizens are empowered to raise their voices against injustice.

D. Regular Audits and Inspection Monitoring:

• Conduct regular audits of the Municipal Corporation’s processes related to building permissions and occupancy certificates. These audits should include randomized inspections to evaluate the adherence to procedures and identify patterns of favoritism or bribery.
• Implement a digital tracking system to monitor inspecting officers’ activities, ensuring their inspections are transparent and justified.
• Justification: The 2nd ARC recommends social audits and regular reviews of processes to ensure that public institutions maintain transparency and accountability in service delivery.

E. Disciplinary Action Against Corrupt Officers:

• Establish a zero-tolerance policy for corruption, ensuring strict disciplinary actions, including suspension and dismissal for officers engaging in bribery or favoritism.
• Justification: John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian philosophy argues for actions that promote the greatest good for the greatest number. Eradicating corruption not only serves public interests but also restores faith in governance, ensuring efficiency for the entire community.

F. Capacity Building and Ethical Training:

• Conduct ethics and accountability workshops for all Municipal Corporation officers and staff, emphasizing their moral responsibility toward public service and the consequences of corrupt practices.
• Example: Singapore has successfully integrated ethics training for public servants, contributing to one of the world’s least corrupt public service systems.
• Justification: Aristotle’s virtue ethics highlights the cultivation of good character through repeated ethical actions. By training staff and fostering an ethical environment, we can promote integrity and reduce the temptation for corrupt behavior.

Corruption and favoritism in the Municipal Corporation severely impact public trust and the efficiency of governance. By adopting e-governance, enhancing transparency, enforcing strict disciplinary measures, and promoting ethical training, we can create a system where decisions are made based on merit and fairness, restoring integrity in public service. The recommendations align with the 2nd ARC and the ethical frameworks of Kant and Mill, emphasizing justice, accountability, and the public good.

Check out  UPSC Coaching Centre Guwahati | APSC Coaching Centre Guwahati | Crack APSC Exam | UPSC Civil Services Exam | Ethics Paper in UPSC Exams