Q.18 What is the right to privacy? How is the right to privacy protected through courts in India and Germany? Explain.
23,Dec 2024
Posted By : SPM IAS Academy
0 Comments
APSC2022
GS2
The right to privacy is the right of an individual to control the dissemination and use of personal information, maintain personal autonomy, and protect one’s dignity. It encompasses the right to make personal decisions without interference, safeguard personal data, and enjoy private spaces free from surveillance. Recognized as an essential facet of personal liberty and dignity, this right has gained constitutional status in both India and Germany through landmark judicial interpretations and protections.
Right to Privacy in India
In India, the right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but has been recognized as an integral part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 by the Supreme Court.
Judicial Recognition of Privacy:
Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1964): This early case hinted at a right to privacy, though the Court did not fully recognize it. Justice Subba Rao’s dissent, however, emphasized that liberty under Article 21 implies privacy.
Gobind v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1975): The Court began to recognize privacy, linking it to Article 21 and Article 19, while noting that privacy is subject to reasonable restrictions for state interests.
Landmark Puttaswamy Judgment:
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017): The Supreme Court’s nine-judge bench unanimously affirmed privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21. This judgment declared privacy a core element of individual dignity, autonomy, and personal liberty, applicable to various aspects of personal life, including data protection.
The Puttaswamy judgment introduced a three-part test for assessing state restrictions on privacy, requiring them to meet principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality, balancing state interests with individual rights.
Contemporary Developments:
The Data Protection Bill, which is being considered in Parliament, draws heavily from the Puttaswamy ruling, addressing concerns around data privacy, individual consent, and government surveillance.
The Puttaswamy decision also guided subsequent cases, like Aadhaar v. Union of India (2018), where the Court upheld Aadhaar’s constitutionality but restricted its mandatory use, asserting that the state’s interference with privacy must serve a compelling interest.
Right to Privacy in Germany
In Germany, the right to privacy has been long-established and is explicitly protected by the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz), particularly under Article 1 (Human Dignity) and Article 2 (Personal Freedom).
Constitutional Foundation:
The right to privacy in Germany stems from the principle of human dignity (Menschenwürde) enshrined in Article 1, which is inviolable. Additionally, Article 2 guarantees individual rights to free development, serving as the basis for privacy protections.
The German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) has strongly affirmed these protections, setting stringent limitations on state actions that may infringe on personal privacy.
Landmark Decisions:
Census Act Case (1983): The Court recognized an individual’s “right to informational self-determination,” declaring that individuals must have control over their data, thus restricting the state’s data collection practices. This ruling introduced data protection as a vital component of privacy rights, emphasizing that privacy includes control over personal information.
Online Surveillance Case (2008): The Court further upheld privacy in the digital age, ruling against unrestricted online surveillance. It asserted a “fundamental right to the confidentiality and integrity of information technology systems,” which mandates strong protections against digital intrusion.
Contemporary Measures and Data Protection:
Germany’s privacy framework has been reinforced by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, which mandates strict data protection and privacy standards across all EU member states, further strengthening individual control over personal data.
Under GDPR, Germany has stringent data protection authorities and compliance requirements, ensuring that personal data is handled with explicit consent and subject to high standards of security, with fines imposed for violations.
While both India and Germany recognize privacy as a fundamental right, the paths they have taken reflect their distinct constitutional frameworks and histories. India’s privacy jurisprudence, especially after the Puttaswamy judgment, has evolved rapidly, granting privacy constitutional recognition and setting limitations on state powers through the three-part test. In Germany, privacy has been deeply integrated into constitutional values, particularly under human dignity and freedom, with robust judicial safeguards and legislative frameworks like GDPR ensuring data privacy.
